The Republican leadership is currently stalling the so called Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act although the legislation is supported by eighty members of Congress and already passed the Judiciary Committee. Patrick Poole, an expert on terrorism, observed that the chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, Bob Corker, has not even held hearings on the legislation. In the House, Speaker Paul Ryan and Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy have not given a public indication that there will be a vote on the bill.

This can be explained by the fact that the core of the Republican Party still sticks to a policy that regards hostility to the Muslim Brotherhood as irrational with people like Bob Corker and Paul Ryan ahead who advocated the Iran Deal respectively the Arab Spring. Changes at the margins of the party should definitely be considered by the core of the establishment.

In general, worries about Islamists groups like the Muslim Brotherhood must be taken more serious.

 

Source: http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/263306/paul-ryan-blocking-muslim-brotherhood-terrorist-daniel-greenfield

 

Massive distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks against the official website of the Muslim Brotherhood forced it to go offline. The hacker also conducted attacks against the website of the Egyptian Freedom and Justice Party that is affiliated with the Muslim Brotherhood. Furthermore, files were stolen from the movement’s database and leaked online. The information that was made public includes IP addresses, e-mails and comments.

Until now the motive behind the cyber attack is not celar yet but it is obvious that the hackers were targeting the Muslim Brotherhood, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) and other organizations linked to the movement.

Source: https://www.hackread.com/muslim-brotherhoods-website-suffers-ddos-attacks/

Nearly 80 senators and representatives support a legislation known as the Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act by co-sponsoring the bill or voting in its favor. Recently, three new congressmen, Jeff Miller, Robert J. Dold and Carlos Curbelo came out in favor of the legislation. The bill has bipartisan support and already passed the House Judiciary Committee. The next step is a vote in the House of Representatives and its approval by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

Regardless the outcome of the vote, the introduction of the bill provides an important opportunity to inform congressmen as well as the public about the Muslim Brotherhood’s links to terrorism. Furthermore, the legislation provides insides into the relations between the Muslim Brotherhood and groups such as the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) and the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA).

Source: http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2016/06/10/nearly-80-congressmen-senators-board-designate-muslim-brotherhood-terrorists/

According to Philip Haney, a former Department of Homeland Security official, the current US-administration deliberately changed records of Muslims with links to terrorism. Before and after an attempted terror attack on a flight from the Netherlands to Detroit on Christmas Day 2009, Haney was supposedly ordered by a superior to erase information on nearly 850 records about individuals and organizations connected to the Muslim Brotherhood network that could have assisted in avoiding such an oversight.

Furthermore, Haney said that the so called Holy Land trial of 2008 proved that these people and front groups belong to a network that supports Hamas. He also confirmed that ties between members of the US-administration and Muslim Brotherhood members might have had an influence on top administration officials to overlook potential terror threats.

The Obama administration even made people with links to terrorism part of its bodies. High-ranked members of the Countering Violent Extremism Steering Committee, who are supposed to represent Muslim communities in the USA at a summit in 2015, publicly renounced the program they actually helped to initiate because they considered it as discriminatory.

Source: http://www.lifezette.com/polizette/obama-admin-scrubbed-muslim-brotherhood-records/

Ben Rhodes, President Barack Obama’s foreign policy expert, allegedly apologized to Muslim Brotherhood associates for the Obama administration’s Syria policy in the context of the latest political deal with Iran.

The Muslim Brotherhood actually relies on Obama’s efforts in favor of regime changes in the Middle East that enable the Brotherhood to take over power. Although such political coups had already taken place in Egypt and several other countries, they were all rolled back. While the Brotherhood was able to gain some power in Morocco, its efforts in Libya, Syria and Yemen were rather unsuccessful. Especially in Syria the Brotherhood has been outmaneuvered by ISIS and Al-Qaeda. Furthermore, the latest Iran deal shows that Obama has changed his strategy from backing Sunni Jihadist groups to supporting Iran and Shiite Jihadists.

Syrian-American activists with links to the Muslim Brotherhood claimed that Ben Rhodes mentioned in a meeting that he is not proud of the Syria policy of the Obama administration. According to the activists he further explained that there had been no other options at that point. A spokesman of the National Security Council meanwhile disputed the activists‘statements about the conversation with Rhodes and said that Rhodes had never distanced himself from the US-policy.

Source: http://www.frontpagemag.com/point/262876/obamas-iran-scammer-apologizes-muslim-brotherhood-daniel-greenfield

 

The news about the airplane crash of EgyptAir Flight MS-804 on its way from Paris to Cairo with 66 casualties immediately led to speculations about a terrorist attack. And indeed, US intelligence agencies claimed that there were indications of an explosion. Experts hint to the fact that there is not only Islamist terrorist activity in France but even much more in Egypt. Since the plane crashed during a return flight to Cairo and it was only on the ground in Paris for one hour, there is a possibility that Egyptian terrorists are behind an eventual attack.

According to Dr. Mark Christian, the president of the Global Faith Institute, a US-think tank specialized on Islamic terrorism, admits that the Muslim Brotherhood has most to gain from terror attacks. Recently there has been a series of terror attacks in Egypt including the killing of security forces or setting fire at tourist sites. In addition, the economic situation of the country is very bad and the recent government of President Abdel Fattah Al-Sisi is already regarded as vulnerable. Al-Sisi promised Egyptians prosperity and safety but has not been able to convert that into reality. Hence, the Muslim Brotherhood can only profit from further destabilization that will sooner or later lead to his overthrow. Christian said that the Muslim Brotherhood has a secret militant wing that is involved in terrorist attacks all over the Middle East.

In case a bomb had been placed in the plane already before its departure in Cairo, this would indicate that terrorists applied a totally new strategy. First, this means that airport personal was involved in the attack and second, it shows that a timed bomb can explode at any place in the world and therefore poses a global threat.

However, until now there is no evidence that the Muslim Brotherhood was involved in this airplane crash but it cannot be ruled out that the organization would be ready to apply this kind of violence in order to enhance its political position within Egypt.
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/egyptair-crash-has-markings-of-muslim-brotherhood-operation/

The bill to brand the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization, the so-called “Muslim Brotherhood Terrorist Designation Act” increasingly gains support in the House. The legislation introduced by Mario Diaz-Balart shall pass a vote later this year and officially has bipartisan support since two Democrats are signing on as co-sponsors. A companion bill introduced in the Senate by Ted Cruz meanwhile has five key co-sponsors. In case the legislation will be enacted, it would outlaw the Muslim Brotherhood’s front groups and freeze its resources. Providing material support to the Brotherhood would then be a crime. Organizations which are identified in the text of the bill as radical front groups of the Muslim Brotherhood include the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), the North American Islamic Trust (NAIT) and the Muslim American Society (MAS). While the Muslim Brotherhood is banned in Egypt, Saudi-Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, the latter even designated CAIR and MAS as terrorist organizations. One of the reasons is their financial support to terrorist groups such as Hamas. In general, the Brotherhood shares ideology with Al-Qaeda, Hamas and ISIS and experts like the former FBI director Robert Mueller claim that “elements of the Muslim Brotherhood both here and overseas have supported terrorism.”

Source: http://www.wnd.com/2016/05/bill-to-ban-muslim-brotherhood-gains-support-from-dems/

Several terror analysts ignore all evidence for the Muslim Brotherhood’s links to terrorism and claim that the group is actually a firewall against violent extremism. Marc Lynch, who is working for the George Washington University and the Project on Middle East Political Science, argued in a Washington Post report that Congress should not designate the Muslim Brotherhood a terrorist organization. According to him, the Muslim Brotherhood served as bulwark against more violent groups due to its ideology of nonviolence and democratic participation. It thus was in competition for recruits with terrorist groups like Al-Qaeda. Notwithstanding, Lynch ignores the fact that Al-Qaeda’s founders, Abdullah Azzam and Osama bin Laden, and its current leader, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, were also members of the Muslim Brotherhood or trained by the group. Furthermore, it has to be considered that the Muslim Brotherhood and Al-Qaeda have the same ultimate goal: the replacement of democratic rule with Sharia. The main difference between the two groups is that the Muslim Brotherhood uses democratic participation as way to undermine democracy and destroy it from within. Al-Qaeda, in contrast, uses violence in order to attack and destroy democratic states. Despite this different approach, the two groups are two sides of the same coin.

 

Source: https://pjmedia.com/homeland-security/2016/05/05/d-c-terror-analyst-still-thinks-muslim-brotherhood-a-firewall-against-violent-extremism/

On Monday, April 18, a group of people who are associated with the United States Council of Muslim Organizations (USCMO) was received by members of the congress. The USCMO is a front organization that aims at advancing the agenda of the Muslim Brotherhood in the USA. This agenda is outlined in a group-internal document called “The Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal of the Group in North America”. In this memorandum the group explicitly states that the mission of the Muslim Brotherhood in North America is to destroy Western civilization from within. Therefore, the USCMO was founded in March 2014 as a political party that tries to mobilize Muslim voters in support of the Muslim Brotherhood agenda. The organization already participated in anti-Semitic, pro-Hamas and pro-Muslim Brotherhood demonstrations and fundraising on behalf of Islamic Relief USA which is an Islamic supremacist charity. Hence, congress should be aware of the USCMO’s real intention und it should be clear that legislators should have nothing to do with its program and members.

 

Source: http://www.aim.org/guest-column/muslim-brotherhood-day-on-capitol-hill/

 

A renowned researcher and director for the Center for Asymmetric Threat Studies at the Swedish Defence University, Lars Nicander, adverts to an ongoing Islamist infiltration of the Swedish government.

Recently, several members of the Green party got under pressure due to their links to Islamic extremists. Lars Nicander points out that the Green party is young and therefore vulnerable to infiltrations of groups such as the Muslim Brotherhood. Thereby they use the same methods that were applied by the Soviet Communists during the Cold War.

The Green Party secretary, Anders Wallner, said in a media interview that the warning will be taken seriously because extremism has no place in this party.

 

Source: http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/mp-inga-belagg-for-islamistisk-infiltration/